http://fm.ea-tel.eu/flashmedia/flashmeeting/fm10531_ac99d1-10531 http://fm.ea-tel.eu/fm/memo.php?pwd=ac99d1-10531 http://fm.ea-tel.eu/public dublincore lom lomi metadata 0:291:0 296:4999:0 49:489:1 490:552:0 553:4997:1 217:4975:0 can you hear me? nope new computer... :-( Try testing (under the prefs tab) hear you fine too! http://ariadne.cs.kuleuven.be/lomi/index.php/HarmonyManifest in d-lib, actually... i'm not sure i remember what was the intent so many years ago :-) http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april02/weibel/04weibel.html if harmonisation means more integration than for instance transforming from one to another, then we should probably explain that early on as well? erik: yes, harmonization needs defining apologies - i thought this was a 90 min meeting :-) no problem! I have enjoyed listening - I'm here to learn about the process... :-) bye! thank YOU! expanded notions of metadata - attention metadata etc attention metadata is less descriptive - more about context music metadata Mood information acknowledge the above, and then focus on the standards tagging automatic metadata creation Section "Metadata standards" Mention tagging, ratings, attention metadata Don't use them in tables but return to them afterwards Divide the list of standards into conceptual categories Adding at least METS Section "Harmonization" The four characteristics deal with interoperability of metadata using a single spec focus on modularity "Harmony in its own world" "processed in a mixed way" machine-processing as an enabler for value-added services automated processing of metadata instances vs specs labels for developers, not end users