http://fm.ea-tel.eu/flashmedia/flashmeeting/fm10532_359257-10532 http://fm.ea-tel.eu/fm/memo.php?pwd=359257-10532 http://fm.ea-tel.eu/public dublincore lom lomi metadata 0:4394:0 39:4874:0 144:4391:0 765:4389:0 Hello hi, Phil! Agreed http://ariadne.cs.kuleuven.be/lomi/index.php/HarmonyManifest hi, tom! http://ariadne.cs.kuleuven.be/lomi/index.php/HarmonyManifest "living in parallel" works for me! :-) glad it's not a real air strike :-) ! I've nothing against academic exercises, just the magnitude of the task "There are two notions of refinement to consider." - d-lib article http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april02/weibel/04weibel.html Ok, makes sense go on ok http://ariadne.cs.kuleuven.be/mediawiki2/index.php/Metadata_2.0 "to be confirmed" * 9 :-) Interested: certainly! sounds good Sounds really interesting! ok - i'll catch up later with what you continue to do now... I have to run now... :-) yes OK. bye! Vocabulary = element and value vocabularies Erik: suggest splitting vocabularies into two different subsections Erik: AM - elements - application profile - syntax but where is the "schema"? with elements? or with AP? Erik: value vocabularies more on the side Erik: AMs different means elements not directly mappable Vocabulary section Erik: source/value tokens refinments: substructure addtitions and semantic narrowing Phil: VDEX only one example, ZTHES another one